Abstract
Although modern engineering education relies heavily on advanced digital tools, access alone does not ensure success for rural students, who often experience psychological resistance to new technologies. Rather than a lack of technical capability, this resistance is an emotional and cognitive defense against fear of failure, identity threat, and social judgment. By synthesizing theories of self-efficacy, technology acceptance, technophobia, and impostor syndrome, the paper introduces a "psychological friction layer" that explains how a student's socioeconomic and linguistic background creates anxiety in laboratory environments. Through case studies across multiple engineering disciplines, the authors contrast rural-transitioning students with urban-exposed peers and offer a four-phase institutional roadmap—spanning psychological readiness assessments, low-friction foundation modules, gamified error handling, and full system integration—to help educators transform initial anxiety into long-term technical competence.
Views & downloads
- Article views
- Full-text downloads
References
12 references- 1] Asrani, Chirag. “Spanning the Digital Divide in India: Barriers to ICT Adoption and Usage.” Journal of Public Affairs, vol. 22, no. 6, 2022, e2598.
- [2] Bandura, Albert. “Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change.” Psychological Review, vol. 84, no. 2, 1977, pp. 191–215.
- [3] Clance, Pauline Rose, and Suzanne A. Imes. “The Impostor Phenomenon in High Achieving Women: Dynamics and Therapeutic Intervention.” Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, vol. 15, no. 3, 1978, pp. 241–247.
- [4] Davis, Fred D. “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology.” MIS Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 3, 1989, pp. 319–340.
- [5] Davis, Fred D., et al. “User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models.” Management Science, vol. 35, no. 8, 1989, pp. 982–1003.
- [6] Khasawneh, Obeidat Y. “The Conceptual Gap Between Technophobia and Computer Anxiety and Its Empirical Consequences.” Technology in Society, vol. 54, 2018, pp. 93–100.
- [7] Rogers, Everett M. Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press, 1962.
- [8] Rosen, Larry D., and Michelle M. Weil. “Computer Anxiety: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of University Students in Ten Countries.” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 11, no. 1, 1995, pp. 45–64.
- [9] Rosen, Larry D., and Michelle M. Weil. “Computer Availability, Computer Experience and Technophobia among Public School Teachers.” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 11, no. 1, 1995, pp. 9–31.
- [10] Sindakis, Stavros, and Gazal Showkat. “The Digital Revolution in India: Bridging the Gap in Rural Technology Adoption.” Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, vol. 13, art. 29, 2024, pp. 1–28.
- [11] Sulochana, P. “Breaking the Invisible Barrier: Psychological Resistance to Technology Adoption among Rural Engineering Students.” Mahendra Engineering College, Namakkal, 2026. Unpublished manuscript.
- [12] Venkatesh, Viswanath, et al. “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View.” MIS Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 3, 2003, pp. 425–478
How to Cite
